However, there was no training to match the purchases. Though Gen. Six months before the invasion of Normandy , 33 divisions had received no joint air-ground training. He developed the "armored column cover", where on-call fighter-bombers maintained a high-level of availability for important tank advances, allowing armor units to maintain a high tempo of exploitation even when they outran their artillery assets.
He also used a modified antiaircraft radar to track friendly attack aircraft to redirect them as necessary, and experimented with assigning fighter pilots to tours as forward air controllers to familiarize them with the ground perspective. When the armored units broke out of the Normandy beachhead, tank commanders were able to communicate directly with overhead fighter-bombers.
Catalog Record: Airpower in three wars | HathiTrust Digital Library
However, despite the innovation, Quesada focused his aircraft on CAS only for major offensives. Typically, both British and American attack aircraft were tasked primarily to interdiction, even though later analysis showed them to be twice as dangerous as CAS. Weyland utilized similar tactics to support the rapid armored advance of General Patton 's Third Army in its drive across France. The American Navy and Marine Corps used CAS in conjunction with or as a substitute for the lack of available artillery or naval gunfire in the Pacific theater.
Navy and Marine F6F Hellcats and F4U Corsairs used a variety of ordnance such as conventional bombs, rockets and napalm to dislodge or attack Japanese troops utilizing cave complexes in the latter part of World War II. As early as the Battles of Khalkhyn Gol in , Soviet aircraft had the task of disrupting enemy ground-operations.
This use increased markedly after the June Axis invasion of the Soviet Union. Joseph Stalin paid the Il-2 a great tribute in his own inimitable manner: when a particular production factory fell behind on its deliveries, Stalin sent the following cable to the factory manager: "They are as essential to the Red Army as air and bread. Though eventually the Air Force supplied sufficient pilots and forward air controllers to provide battlefield support, coordination was still lacking.
Since pilots operated under centralized control, ground controllers were never able to familiarize themselves with pilots, and requests were not processed quickly. Harold K. If you can get it, it can't find you. If it can find you, it can't identify the target. If it can identify the target, it can't hit it. But if it does hit the target, it doesn't do a great deal of damage anyway. In December , Lt. James Van Fleet , commander of the Eighth U. Army , formally requested the United Nations Commander, Gen.
The U.S. Army Wanted This Weird Jump Jet (Until the Air Force Stopped Them)
Mark Clark , to permanently attach an attack squadron to each of the four army corps in Korea. Despite the rocky start, the USAF would also work to improve its coordination efforts. It eventually required pilots to serve 80 days as forward air controllers FACs , which gave them an understanding of the difficulties from the ground perspective and helped cooperation when they returned to the cockpit. The Army also learned to assist, by suppressing anti-aircraft fire prior to air strikes. The U. Army wanted a dedicated USAF presence on the battlefield to reduce fratricide , or the harm of friendly forces.
The air liaison officer ALO was born. The ALO is an aeronautically rated officer that has spent a tour away from the cockpit, serving as the primary adviser to the ground commander on the capabilities and limitations of airpower. Firstly, the USAF preferred interdiction over fire support while the Army regarded support missions as the main concern for air forces.
The third point dealt with the lack of training and joint culture, which are necessary for an adequate air-ground integration.
Interservice rivalry and airpower in the Vietnam War
Finally, USAF aircraft were not designed for CAS: "the advent of jet fighters , too fast to adjust their targets, and strategic bombers , too big to be used on theatre, rendered CAS much harder to implement". The Howze Board, which studied the question, published a landmark report describing the need for a helicopter-based CAS requirement.
Nevertheless, it did eventually adopt the use of helicopter gunships and attack helicopters in the CAS role. Though the Army gained more control over its own CAS due to the development of the helicopter gunship and attack helicopter, the Air Force continued to provide fixed-wing CAS for Army units. The assumption of responsibility for the air request net by the Air Force improved communication equipment and procedures, which had long been a problem.
Additionally, a major step in satisfying the Army's demands for more control over their CAS was the successful implementation of close air support control agencies at the corps level under Air Force control. Though helicopters were initially armed merely as defensive measures to support the landing and extraction of troops, their value in this role lead to the modification of early helicopters as dedicated gunship platforms. Though not as fast as fixed-wing aircraft and consequently more vulnerable to anti-aircraft weaponry, helicopters could utilize terrain for cover, and more importantly, had much greater battlefield persistence owing to their low speeds.
The latter made them a natural complement to ground forces in the CAS role. In addition, newly developed anti-tank guided missiles , demonstrated to great effectiveness in the Yom Kippur War , provided aircraft with an effective ranged anti-tank weapon. These considerations motivated armies to promote the helicopter from a support role to a combat arm.
Senior Lecturer: History
Though the U. Army controlled rotary-wing assets, coordination continued to pose a problem. During wargames, field commanders tended to hold back attack helicopters out of fear of air defenses, committing them too late to effectively support ground units. The earlier debate over control over CAS assets was reiterated between ground commanders and aviators.
In the mids, after Vietnam, the USAF decided to train an enlisted force to handle many of the tasks the ALO was saturated with, to include terminal attack control. Now the ALO mainly serves in the liaison role, the intricate details of mission planning and attack guidance left to the enlisted members of the Tactical Air Control Party. Various aircraft can fill close air support roles. Military helicopters are often used for close air support and are so closely integrated with ground operations that in most countries they are operated by the army rather than the air force.
Fighters and ground attack aircraft like the A Thunderbolt II provide close air support using rockets, missiles, small bombs, and strafing runs. In World War II, dive bombers and fighters were used in close air support. Dive bombing permitted greater accuracy than level bombing runs, while the rapid altitude change made it more difficult for antiaircraft gunners to track. The Junkers Ju 87 Stuka is a well known example of a dive bomber built for precision bombing but which was successfully utilised for CAS. It was fitted with wind-blown whistles on its landing gear to enhance its psychological effect.
While some such as the Hawker Typhoon and the P Thunderbolt , performed admirably in that role, there were a number of compromises that prevented most fighters from making effective CAS platforms. Fighters were usually optimized for high-altitude operations without bombs or other external ordnance — flying at low level with bombs quickly expended fuel. Cannons had to be mounted differently for strafing — strafing required a further and lower convergence point than aerial combat did.
Such aircraft included the Ilyushin Il-2 , the single most produced military aircraft design in all of aviation history. The Soviets also used the Polikarpov Po-2 , a biplane, as a ground attack aircraft. In the Vietnam War , the United States introduced fixed and rotary wing gunships, cargo aircraft refitted as gun platforms to serve as close air support and air interdiction aircraft. The first of these was the AC Spooky.
Usually close support is thought to be only carried out by fighter-bombers or dedicated ground-attack aircraft , such as the A Thunderbolt II Warthog or Su Frogfoot , but even large high-altitude bombers have successfully filled close support roles using precision-guided munitions. With significantly longer loiter times, range, and weapon capacity, bombers can be deployed to bases outside of the immediate battlefield area, with hour missions being commonplace since After the initial collapse of the Taliban regime in Afghanistan, airfields in Afghanistan became available for continuing operations against the Taliban and Al-Qaeda.
The use of information technology to direct and coordinate precision air support has increased the importance of intelligence , surveillance , and reconnaissance in utilizing CAS. Laser , GPS , and battlefield data transfer are routinely used to coordinate with a wide variety of air platforms able to provide CAS.
Recent doctrine  reflects the increased use of electronic and optical technology to direct targeted fires for CAS. Air platforms communicating with ground forces can also provide additional aerial-to-ground visual search, ground-convoy escort, and enhancement of command and control C2 , assets which can be particularly important for low intensity conflict. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. Learn how and when to remove these template messages. This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources.